Yaoi Doujin Manga Archive Blog

Chapter 1 paragraph 4 - the form of government -

Some of you will 'happen, occasionally, to observe how the government of our country is not representative of its citizens. I lately I feel like a pigeon represented at the congress of the hunters. We call our type of government "democracy" and that 'a word derived from greek and means "people's government". It really is not 'a democracy because the people do not govern, in fact I've never been called to vote a law as they were citizens of Athens. Ours is' a representative "democracy" that is where the people are represented by elected people. There are also the "oligarchy" and that 'government by the few and the plutocracy and that' "the government of the rich." Now I mischievously, I got the idea, certainly weird and wrong, that our democracy, when the people delegate to the elected decision makers, turn into reality in either or both types of government that I described below. Here is my thesis, I present only as an intellectual game and surely and 'devoid of any sense of logic and verisimilitude.
begins with the choice of candidates to represent the people, in the case of democracy should be chosen by the people themselves, but first here's the curious thing, the candidates are chosen by party officials who are not persons elected by the people, in addition: with the new electoral law (did not want to change it in the first 100gg, surely they will), we choose the candidate who will be 'elected and not as a first list of people including the city could still choose. We come then to the election, the candidates (chosen by the parties) have a function of the media coverage of the party making the presentation, not all the same as it would be logical. So we have that the party, not the people who already 'has gained power has many more weapons in' the other to be able to maintain and even increase. Apart from the visibility and 'institutional' also takes a great deal of money for the candidate to pay the costs of electioneering. There are even tables that say what we need to spend to access various positions, from deputy to the local administrator. It may therefore an ordinary citizen, who has no financial means to stand for election? No, not if ' backed by someone who has the money. But if it is' not 'then once elected who loaned him the money going to want' something to the contrary? Moreover, there is 'no variation with' for a citizen who wants to stand for election to do so does not belong to a party. That it would seem that the parties are plenipotenziali and have a firm grip on power, which did not come from the people but by themselves they can afford to do what they want. In fact, the parties to support, are forced, on the one hand to drain the state to place its representatives in each place at the cost of invent, or (better, as well) to ask for money around. A huge amount money is used by parties to build consensus and overcome the competing parties. The money pouring in a lawful and unlawful, in order to establish the new government for the interests of those who bestow. Who gives the money is usually 'who has them, then we say "the rich", which can be people, but more' often companies, banks or even other nations. The parties then desiring to perpetuate its power in the reality to those who have transferred funds. Here's how, in my opinion, can sometimes happen to have the impression (certainly wrong), that our representatives do not make our interest but that of someone else. With the exception of Italy, I think quite clear that "democracy" or the true government of the people do not exist anywhere and look good is not 'never existed, except in Athens before the arrival of Alexander the Great. This does not mean however that there is no 'solution but you have to find it. Studying history is known as the young "democracies" are often assisted by one or more generations in which the predominant sense of honor and justice, in which a majority of representatives to serve the community feels. Often as time goes by "democracy" is corrupted to become a dictatorship. According
helps me get angry and show it, in fact the people icazzato scary.

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrazia

12055 Queens Blvd Kew Gardens

Chapter 1 Paragraph 3 - The vile money -

Chapter I Paragraph 3
What 'wealth? What are the currency and the money? I realize that talking to economists: as often happens to those who study a subject in depth, they take for granted some of the concepts that are not at all; them the same concepts we take for granted, but we at least have the excuse of not understanding anything economy. Without this small ears are stretched to the point. The money was invented to facilitate trade, and if I produce chairs, you produce cars, and he produces pears and exchange the goods are not 'easy, then we need of a united' which divide the common good that produce (money) to be able to exchange the goods that we produced. Going back through the history of money there are many things that should be clarified, but that 's a topic that will address' below. Suffice it to say that for a long period, the coins were made of gold or silver, each coin was written about how much he weighed, and since 'these metals have an intrinsic value of the currency drew its legitimacy' of the quantity 'of metal that was present in the same currency. Who takes responsibility 'of conirare money was the "gentleman" who, took the metal on the bottom, put it in the molds he made sure it weighed the tot was written above and then distributing it. To repay the costs, the 'lord', actually 'did not write the true weight on the coins, but a little' more 'so' he kept a bit 'of gold. Of course the "ladies" was held enough to repay the costs of liability 'and something more'. The difference between the nominal value of the piece of metal and its intrinsic value given by the weight (less than the nominal one) was called "seigniorage." In a future post I will talk about 'where it takes its legitimacy' money flowing now and if it still exists seigniorage. Now I want to highlight some inconsistencies in the monetary system in general. If the value and 'given by the production of goods, gold and' just a way to represent the value of them, 'cause who found the gold became rich and who worked the land was always poor? Says, but gold has intrinsic value, in Ralt 'is not true,' cause especially in antiquity 'gold was used mainly to make jewelry and jewelry, had no utlita' of bronze or iron, while less than that of pears and wheat. So the intrinsic value of gold was not but it was a conventional value, then we attach a value, not according to the need for gold we have, but according to a choice shared by the people. In China, at the time of Marco Polo was not gold coins, but they were already printed on mulberry leaves, so 'while the cities' Italian maritime war were made to rub someone the gold and silver had already' found a solution to the problem. But if the value of the goods have, as never to produce the goods we need to ask to borrow the money? If the primitive thought they could not produce for lack of money (which does not exist), how would you survive? Why 'Italy must apply for the money borrowed to produce wealth, when in fact' the production of wealth and 'value itself?

goods, value, work
http://www.filosofia.unina.it/tortora/sdf/Sesto/VI.10.html Money

http://it.geocities.com/pietro_valocchi/numismatica/
information on various currency
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneta
Comics explanation of the functioning of seigniorage today
http://www .signoraggio.com/isola/bankenstein_1di9.html

South Park Onlinr Iphone

Chapter 1 Paragraph 2 - The Work -

According to the physical work is obtained by "burning" energy, this' truth in physical theories, for cars and people. To get the meat, primitive man, he had to go hunting, find prey, hunt, and then had to go home, cook clean and eat. All this requires effort that is 'work, that' energy use. Over time, technology and 'less advanced and the man has always used his energy to get food, for example, initially plowing the land with its own forces, then by oxen, and one man with an ox could do the job 10, then with the tractor and one man with a tractor could do the work and effort of 100 1 / 100. There 's nothing to be done to create the food (which contains the energy we use to live) and' required the use of energy, that is our muscles or animal, whether mineral or electromagnetic. Not just for eating energies are spent, but also to build houses, to computers, etc. to go into space. I mean all the activities' Human "burn" energy, and progress through the "cars" are the bulk of the effort, while more and more people 'are sitting in front of a monitor, but are themselves the work of 100, 100 000 1000 or primitive.
Each year the progress allows any person to produce more '. To say that I know an example: an architect only up to 10 years ago ', had to redesign most' times the same design to be able to give to the municipality, the customer and the organization of construction, more 'every little change was a great job , 'cause sometimes you have to redo all four designs from scratch. Now the changes require a few seconds and make copies of the design in a couple of minutes, whereas before it took days. This has allowed architects to improve the quality 'of the drawings, and produce much more'. Let's say a ratio of 1 to 5 at least, that in the last 10 years, and the same is true for almost all the work, a bit 'more' or a little 'less.
But then, 'cause architects, graphic designers, factory workers, employees in the offices, which produce five times more' not earn 5 times more '? Why indeed earn less? (Net of inflation). Why did my father's salary as a professor there supported the family and now a professor can not 'afford even to pay for the house and car? Cat hatching there.
In other words, the capacity 'to produce a person through the use of fossil fuels and solar, and' multiplied, so each person has, say, to say the least 100 times that produced a primitive man, but 'the Primitive man lived by while we today need to borrow to get to the end of the month.
But since 'modern man undoubtedly produce something, and something that economists call the wealth, and' no doubt that if this wealth does not go to those who produce it to someone else. Where to go? Who are you? How many man-years are required to build an atomic bomb? How come some people have more assets' GDP of large states such as Italy and there are people who have nothing to eat? Perhaps these people are able to produce this wealth for themselves doing the work of millions of people from themselves? 'Cause there are parents who see their creatures die of hunger, while the waste only in NY you could feed a city' of the third world?

the concept of work in Physics
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavoro_ 28fisica% 29%
the concept of work in economics
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavoro_ 28economia%% 29
A hint about where the wealth is more 'we produce
http://www.signoraggio.com/signoraggio_fumettoisoladeinaufraghi.html
Paper: on physical and the economy, very, very interesting
"History of Abundance" by Luigi Sertorius

Thick Brazillian Legs

Chapter 1 Paragraph 1 - How 'begun - First Post Introduction

Four concepts of astronomical geography (ripassino): According to the theory
now more 'in vogue (but more and more' contentious), the universe was born from a big explosion. That is all matter and energy (it makes sense to distinguish them?), Were once concentrated in one place and then suddenly this ball and small dense decides to explode, the famous Big Bang, the universe and the story begins.
I took it to far I know but it 's good to understand' cause there are too many products in the supermarket wrappers (I know I promised to be rigorous, I recover quickly).
The matter began to expand and then to clot, to form the planets and stars. There 's a theory much in vogue (the second law of thermodynamics), which took a bit' of weight says that as long as 'there will be' difference in amount 'of energy in the universe that will continue' to move, when all things will have the same amount 'of energy will stop everything'. To understand the idea and simplified 'this: If I have a piece of hot iron and place it near a cold, the heat goes from hot to cold, as long as' both will not be warm, because the heat only moves from one thing to warm a cool thing and everything and when 'warm does not move more', when everything will be 'warm nothing will move' more '.
To understand: the universe, however large, there is a finite amount 'of energy, which some scientists believe, will end'. Since the land for a negligible amount of the universe, we can imagine that it in turn has provided a quantity 'minimum energy available including; one on the planet from the Sun and that emitted a quantity' negligible, if we consider the universe a quantity 'decent when you consider how much energy needs to sustain life on our planet. To say that
on earth we have a limited amount 'of energy used to run out, there arrived from afar, but I need to resume the subject later and put it in its proper perspective.
but says to us that we care? Mica ends tomorrow. It depends.
You put gasoline in your car? You asked how much oil there 'on the earth? How long that could last there 'if we continue to use it at this rate? It would seem that most scientists' optimism after thorough studies have found that within your life you happen to know that 'when the oil will' finish (hell I had just bought the new motor). We know that we use natural gas for cooking, heating, etc. to generate energy, and 'linked to oil and then' cause the Italian government wants to allocate several million euro to make that rigasifigatori between design and construction will be ready just before the gas is over, or too expensive to be affordable?

These are not the only or at least my sources but here are some useful links: How to Form the Oil

http://www.linguaggioglobale.com/terra/txt/55.htm
Interesting read "studies oil reserves "
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrolio
second law of thermodynamics
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondo_principio_della_termodinamica
beginning of the history of the universe the Big Bang
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang
too many bags at the supermarket
http://ritorno-alla-natura.blog.kataweb.it/ritorno_alla_natura/2006/ 10/un_empire_sate_.html
Click on the link on the gas-per-view transmission
http://www.raiclicktv.it/raiclickpc/secure/folder.srv?id=2100

Dragonball Doujinshis Online

Post an introduction: I
sorry if this first post I will be 'just concentrate on the logical step to follow, then I will be' much more 'rigorous, even in form, but' this being an introduction, let me digress a bit '.
In this blog, try ' to give a complete form with all the concepts that I have acquired in recent years, along with considerations based on them.
I must say that in recent years, and 'dramatically increased my awareness about the world police-economic reasons are varied, but I read a lot, I researched a lot, I had a lot of important personal experiences.
then begin 'from the beginning, that' the physical universe.
I also just say that everything I write, although it is often the result of studies and other studies, should not be taken at face value, on the contrary. The physics of today and 'very different from that of only one hundred years ago, many certainties have proved to be mistakes, a lot of theories considered absurd developments have led to incredible. Date to explain the reality 'that we use two theories are incompatible: quantum theory and wave theory, one excludes the other but to explain some things you use one, others are using to explain the other. So although it is certain that there is something wrong ', seriously we continue to turn a blind eye.
Some might ask, but this title has to say here that what he says? No: we wanted to include me in physics but then I chose another faculty ', the study through the history books and biographies, jumping from pole in Frascati and the economy also was one of my interests but in the end I did not choose either that faculty 'and so on.
am one of those who know a bit 'of everything and then nothing good, so take what I write only as a starting point to research and draw your own conclusions (though I've my present them all right). Other hand, are convinced that things more 'interesting people who know arise from different materials and combining the knowledge of those materials, usually known only to insiders, they discover new things, but I'm not talking about me I'm talking about bigwigs, who make up the history of thought.