For those who hoped that after the departure of Blair in England could begin to breathe a different air and 'have been refuted already' on the first day of work for the new Minister Gordon Brown.
Apart from the fact that it is not clear as well: who started the war in Iraq under false excuses to be become peacemaker in the Middle East (Tony Blair), and now 'again with the usual staging of attetntati Al Qaeda in London.
you remember the murder of a poor Brazilian boy in the subway initially passed off as an anti-terrorist operation, the preparation of a hoax can not attack with liquid bombs on aircraft scheduled to be unlikely terrorists, including I think I already talked about 'in a previous post. Not to mention that the bales from the first day we were told about the attacks on buses and subways in part succeeded in part no.
said today as usual, the paternity 'of the alleged attempted attacks (sorry the cacophony), and' was given to Al Qaeda, even if you do not know on what basis. Furthermore, it is not clear if the first car was discovered because 'abandoned by a young man who had crashed on the bins or operators of a suspicious autombulanza smoke coming out of the car.
both seem to me lies, first because 'it is not clear why the bomber may have done everything to attract attention to herself by going to crash and then running away leaving the car where it happens.
The history of smoking then I "smell" even more ', you do not understand why' of smoking should quit not yet triggered a car bomb and, if you do not understand why 'before defusing a bomb, apparently on the verge of exploding, have taken away the car.
The second car 'instead found a deposit directly into the police,' cause you found in the parking ban.
Now I feel really unlikely that the alleged bombers are the perfect ibecilli from an organizational perspective, one puts the car in the removal area, so 'to play for the chance' to make the attack with the result and almost certain to be discovered first opoi; the atro bumps into buckets and then run away leaving the suspected car bomb at the mercy of the first alert that passes, or something that puts a lot of smoke, but apparently does not burn, so that the first pass that gets suspicious.
It is not known, however, on what basis Gordon Brown and the police say that the track being followed and 'the Al Qaeda.
Sorry but I think the thing that most 'probable' that the police have seized a car in no parking and entrance hall which has spun and hit a basket (probably driven by a thief), things that happen everyday and then invented the story is the bomb.
http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Esteri/2007/06_Giugno/29/bomba_londra_gb.shtml
http://www.repubblica.it/2007/06/sezioni/esteri/londra-bomba/londra- bomb / london-bomba.html
http://www.euronews.net/index.php?page=info&article=430274&lng=1&option=1